TENSION has enveloped Ekiti State as the Supreme Court delivers its
verdict today in a matter brought before it by erstwhile governor of the
state, Chief Segun Oni.
Following tension in the state, the police and other security
agencies have increased security presence, with the state police command
announcing that it had done all that was necessary to ensure adequate
security of life and property before, during and after the judgment.
The state Police Commissioner, Mr Sotonye Wakama, according to the
command, had met with the leaders of the political parties involved,
saying they had been “mandated to caution their supporters against
fomenting trouble before, during and after the judgment.”
The command’s Public Relations Officer, Mr. Victor Babayemi, said “we
are monitoring the situation very closely,” adding that “We summoned
all the leaders of the political parties on Tuesday, and it was agreed
that they will talk to their supporters and party members in view of
today’s judgment to ensure that there is peace in the state.”
Babayemi said: “Our intelligence unit had been sent out to gather
information from the public. We have also deployed our men to all
strategic positions across the state to forestall breakdown of law and
order that may arise as a result of the judgment. So, we don’t foresee
crisis before, during and after the judgement.”
However, people of the state have been discussing today’s Supreme
Court judgment, with some people in Ado Ekiti, the state capital
alleging they were warned to stay indoors on Friday (today) as
supporters of the various parties had said that they would close down
the state.
But in reaction to the tension generated by the impending verdict,
Chairman of Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) in Ekiti, Chief Jide Awe,
assured that his party members would not foment trouble.
Awe said his members did not take laws into their hands, even at a
time when situations were more grievous than this, saying the party had
“avowed confidence in the judiciary and would not involve the action
that would desecrate the temple of justice.”
He expressed the belief that the party would be victorious in the end.
Chairman of the PDP in the state, Mr. Makanjuola Ogundipe, said there
was no tension in the party, saying “we are all at peace about the
judgment of today.”
Ogundipe in a statement signed by his media aide, Mr. Femi Omolusi,
said “PDP is a law-abiding party and will accept the judgment anyhow it
comes because the Supreme Court has integrity just as we believe in the
Nigerian judiciary.”
He however said “we have a good case and sure of victory.”
The full panel of the apex court presided over by Justice Tanko
Mohammed fixed today after parties in the suit adopted their processes.
In his submission, counsel to Oni, J.K Gadzama (SAN) urged the court
to set aside the October 15, 2010 judgment of the lower court which
sacked Oni on ground of alleged likelihood of bias.
He argued that the suspended President of the Court of Appeal,
Justice Ayo Salami who constituted and presided over the panel and also
wrote the lead judgment of the Appeal Court that sacked Oni from office
had close affinity with Senator Bola Tinubu, the alter ego of Fayemi’s
party, the ACN.
He said: “Bias or likelihood of it makes a decision a nullity and is
therefore a sufficient ground for the lower court to set aside its own
judgment.”
However, in a preliminary objection, Fayemi through his counsel,
Olusola Baiyashea, said the Supreme Court did not have the jurisdiction
to hear the appeal.
Fayemi submitted that going by the reports of the National Judicial
Council (NJC) which investigated the allegation, Salami and other judges
of the appellate court which sat over the matter have been exonerated
hence the allegation had become irrelevant to the instant case.
He also argued that the reliefs sought by the appellant emanated from
the governorship election tribunal which case should terminate at the
Court of Appeal.
He submitted that the court has no jurisdiction to entertain the
appeal, being an appeal emanating from the decision of the court below
in governorship election petition of Ekiti State arising from the
governorship election of 2007 to which Section 246 (3) of the 1999
Constitution is applicable.
He also submitted that there was no valid appeal before the court.
Source: http://www.tribune.com.ng/news2013/en/news/item/13248-tension-in-ekiti-as-supreme-court-decides-fayemi,-oni%E2%80%99s-fate-today.html
- Blogger Comment
- Facebook Comment
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
0 comments:
Post a Comment